Flexible work arrangements in Singapore explained: TG-FWAR rules since December 2024, wellbeing evidence, policy design and manager tips for HR teams.

Key Takeaways:
Flexible work arrangements in Singapore are agreed changes to where, when or how much an employee works, known as flexi-place, flexi-time and flexi-load. Since 1 December 2024, the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests require every employer to have a process for formal requests and to consider each one fairly, which makes flexibility a wellbeing and compliance issue for HR.
This article sets out what the guidelines require, what the evidence says about flexibility and mental health, and how to design a policy and equip managers so that flexible work supports wellbeing rather than blurring the line between work and rest.
The Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (TG-FWAR) were launched by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) and the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) in April 2024 and took effect on 1 December 2024. According to the MOM guidance page, they replaced the 2014 Tripartite Advisory on FWAs and the 2017 Tripartite Standard on FWAs.
The guidelines do not give employees a right to flexible work, and they do not force employers to approve every request. They set minimum requirements for how formal requests are handled. Informal, day-to-day arrangements that already work for both sides can continue without a formal request.
The guidelines recognise three broad types of arrangement:
Under the TG-FWAR, employees who have completed probation may make a formal request. Employers then have a defined process to follow. The steps below summarise the requirements described by MOM and the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP).
Law firm Allen and Gledhill's summary of the guidelines lists the grounds that are generally treated as reasonable: a significant increase in cost, a significant drop in productivity or output or the ability to meet customer needs, or an arrangement that is simply not feasible for the role. Grounds that are not reasonable include management not believing in flexible work, a supervisor wanting to see the employee in the office despite satisfactory performance, and a tradition of not offering FWAs.
MOM says all employers are expected to comply. Employees who feel their request was not properly considered can approach TAFEP, which assesses the case and directs the employer to comply if it finds the request was not handled properly. The guidelines are about fair process, so documentation of each decision protects both the employee and the organisation.
Flexible work is already widespread. MOM's Conditions of Employment 2024 report found that 72.7% of firms offered at least one scheduled FWA in 2024, up from 68.1% in 2023. Counting both scheduled and unscheduled arrangements, 84.8% of firms offered at least one, and these firms employed 89.7% of the workforce.
The most common scheduled arrangements were flexi-hours (44.4% of firms), part-time work (38.8%) and scheduled teleworking (38.4%). The most common unscheduled arrangement was unplanned time off, offered by 68.8% of firms. In other words, most Singapore employees already work somewhere that offers some flexibility. The question for HR is whether that flexibility is fair, consistent and good for health.
The answer depends on who controls the flexibility. A Cochrane systematic review by Joyce and colleagues, published in 2010, examined flexible working interventions and their health effects. It found that self-scheduling of shifts was associated with improvements in outcomes including blood pressure, tiredness, mental health, sleep and self-rated health. Flexibility imposed by the employer, such as involuntary part-time work or fixed-term contracts, had neutral or negative effects. The authors described the evidence as limited and their conclusions as tentative.
The Cochrane summary points to a practical lesson for HR: flexibility helps when it gives employees genuine control over their time. It does not help when it simply shifts uncertainty onto them.
Global guidance is consistent with this. The WHO's fact sheet on mental health at work lists flexible working arrangements as an example of organisational interventions that reduce risks to mental health. Locally, the Tripartite Advisory on Mental Health and Well-being at Workplaces, issued by MOM, SNEF and NTUC in November 2023, asks employers to develop an FWA policy and suggests flexi-load, flexi-location and flexi-time to help employees recovering from mental health conditions return to work.
Stress at work remains a real concern. In a September 2025 written parliamentary answer, MOM said iWorkHealth data from 2024 showed that about one in three employees surveyed experienced work-related stress or burnout, a proportion it described as relatively stable since 2021.
A good policy meets the TG-FWAR process requirements and also sets the norms that keep flexibility healthy. Use the following steps.
Flexibility works best alongside practical support. ThoughtFull's corporate wellness programme in Singapore gives employees app-based access to text-based coaching and video therapy wherever they are working, plus workshops on topics such as emotional resilience, with aggregated, anonymised trends for HR through the Insights Dashboard.
Managers make most FWA decisions, so their skills decide whether the policy is experienced as fair. They need both process knowledge and the confidence to talk about wellbeing without prying.
Programmes such as the Psychologically Safe Manager programme help team leaders have these conversations with care. Our guide on supporting remote employees' mental health covers practical ways to keep dispersed teams connected.
Measure both fairness and health. On fairness, track the number of formal requests, approval rates, time to decision and the reasons for rejection by department. Large differences between teams doing similar work are a warning sign.
On health, combine anonymised measures such as wellbeing survey results, absence trends and use of support services. Singapore's free iWorkHealth tool, developed by MOM and the WSH Council, lets organisations survey psychosocial stressors confidentially. Finally, ask people directly in pulse surveys whether their arrangement gives them real control over their time, since control is the factor the research links most clearly to better health.
Check that your FWA request process meets the TG-FWAR requirements, train managers to apply it consistently, and connect flexibility to clear wellbeing support. ThoughtFull is a regional provider supporting employees in 30 languages across more than 80 locations in Asia, which suits teams that work flexibly across borders. To discuss how this fits your workforce, speak to our team. You can also read our overview of wellness benefits for employees in Singapore.
No. Employers are not required to approve every request. Since 1 December 2024, however, the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests require all employers to have a process for formal requests, to consider them fairly, and to reply in writing within two months, giving reasons if a request is rejected.
Employees who have completed their probation can make a formal FWA request under the TG-FWAR. The request should be in writing and include the date, type of arrangement, expected frequency and duration, the reason, and any start and end dates, unless the employer has set its own format.
Generally accepted grounds include a significant increase in cost, a significant drop in productivity, output or customer service, or the arrangement not being feasible for the job. Rejecting a request because management does not believe in flexible work, or because of tradition, is not considered reasonable.
Employees can approach TAFEP, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices. TAFEP assesses the case and, if it finds the employer did not properly consider the request, directs the employer to comply with the guidelines. Keeping written records helps both sides.
It can, when employees have real control. A Cochrane review found that self-scheduling of shifts was linked to better mental health, sleep and self-rated health, while employer-imposed flexibility showed neutral or negative effects. Clear boundaries on after-hours contact also matter for recovery and rest.
1 https://employmenthero.com/sg/resources/wellness-at-work-report/
2 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000486#bib47
3 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000486#bib47
4 https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/sporeans-more-stressed-global-average-16-say-their-stress-not-manageable-study-2294541
5.https://www.randstad.com.sg/hr-trends/workforce-trends/singaporeans-want-career-learning-development-opportunities/
6 https://www.imh.com.sg/Newsroom/News-Releases/Documents/NYMHS_Press%20Release_FINAL19Sep2024.pdf
7 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000486


